asked Jul 05 '19 at 21:12 by halfshavedyaks (21)

edited Jul 10 '19 at 15:58

I am evaluating the demo of BWS on linux.

I currently use Reaper.

I am finding that when playing a live software instrument from a midi keyboard that Bitwig can only manage one note without Xruns, and Reaper can manage 3 or 4 notes.

Same plugin, same keyboard input, same low latency Jack settings.

My panel CPU meter even registers a similar cpu usage in both cases, but with BWS I get xruns and with reaper i don't.

I am using a liquorix pre-empt kernel.

Now I know a fair bit about optimising for low latency performance, but in this case what is bugging me is the difference in performance between BWS and Reaper - its a deal breaker.

Since the only variable is the host DAW there must be something non-optimum in BWS. But I can't find any relevant settings in BWS to change, all that stuff is in jack and that is the same for both DAWs.

Does any one have any suggestions about what I might change?

Should there be specific real time priority settings for BWS set somewhere in the system?

EDIT: I also tested on MacOS and the difference there is much smaller - less than 10% I would guess, reaper is still better, but not by much.

12next page »

Yes I can confirm this too, using VST under linux in bitwig is causing xruns for some of them. I tried the heavy VST from Seaboard and I had xruns every +-5 sec too. Will try it in reaper to see if it's the same behaviour.



answered Apr 29 at 17:44 by eeight (31)

so far for me it's been every third party vst I have tried from a wide variety of developers.

of course whether the spike actually causes an xrun will depend on buffer settings and the spikes do vary a bit in height - although the max load value reported in bitwig's "DSP performance graph" seems to always be around 9ms.

even more strange and distressing is the spikes continue even when the plugin is turned off and only disappear when it is removed from the signal chain entirely.

seems to me like a serious bug in the vst handling.

when I turn off a third party vst the average dsp load drops as one would expect, but the spikes continue. I've only found one plugin where the spikes stop completely when it is in the signal chain but turned off.


answered Apr 29 at 19:00 by halfshavedyaks (21)

Please halfshavedyaks, write to signaling the behavior... I thank you very much for all your effort. I've had troubles while recording many tracks (ex. 10 tracks for drums) and a lot of synths playing the base but didn't realize any time-correlation trouble, but noticed that the load was not so significant. Hope this will get to some point. Please report any answer you get. Thank you again. Fabrizio

  — (Apr 29 at 19:22) fsciarra62


I upgraded yesterday from bitwig 2.x to 3.x and experiencing xruns (same setup, just updated bitwig). I even double the buffer in jack (from 128 to 256) and still experiencing xruns.

BW team, you should consider trying to find what is eating our cpu. Very easy to reproduce, install BW 2 - add some poly, fm synths compare the dsp graph with BW 3.

Would be happy to buy the full version if you find the solution. Cheers


answered Jul 11 '19 at 20:47 by eeight (31)

edited Jul 12 '19 at 01:14

I was originally testing 2.5 but I have now tested BWS3 and they seem much the same. Exactly which version of BWS did you have better performance with? Was it earlier than 2.5?

  — (Jul 12 '19 at 03:22) halfshavedyaks

2.5.1 are you pushing BWS to the lowest latency possible (setting jack as low as possible without having xruns, then update to BWS 3.x == xruns (again same setup + doubling the buffer == xruns too, so for me it's less optimized in BWS).

  — (Jul 12 '19 at 03:30) eeight

my original comment was about 2.5.1 I had poor performance on that also.

I was testing by seeing how many notes I could play without xruns on a very cpu intensive synth sound (using u-he Diva)

I was testing mostly at 88.2khz 128 samples, which is a quite challenging setting. But the performance was obviously better on reaper on other settings too.

  — (Jul 12 '19 at 11:35) halfshavedyaks

What kind of hardware are you running? How much memory? I would say 8GB min is needed if you want to do more than basic stuff. See this thread for setting up Jack: Try 44.1 khz, 256 frames, 3 buffers and go from there. Make sure "realtime" is checked in qjackctl. Does Guitarix running by itself work OK? You can also try running directly to ALSA in the Bitwig settings.


answered Jul 14 '19 at 22:28 by dirtcooker (21)

Yes 8GB of RAM with a i7 - 4 cores. Like I said the same setup is working fine in BWS 2.5.x - the new version is causing xruns. Surely more CPU hungry. All other software are running fine (huge patch in pure data, guitarix etc). I reverted back to BWS 2.5.x for now.


answered Jul 15 '19 at 02:36 by eeight (31)

This isn't my experience. I run Bitwig on two computers: one is almost like the systems you describe: i7 (first gen) with 16GB RAM but the other is an intel netbook (dual core celeron at 1,6Ghz) with 4GB RAM (here the government gives one for free to each college student and they gave one also for me because I was a professor.). Both work flawless. In the tiny one, with 44.1 Khz and a buffer of 256 you can play reasonably complex songs (easily exceeding standalone devices like an Octatrack in complexity) without noticeable xruns and with few and sparse "saved" xruns (the ones that appear btween parentheses in the counter).

I run 3.0.3.

Well configured, it works. I did all the homework at the same time (irtq, USB priority, PCI priority, low latency kernel, etc) so I don't know wich settings where more important, but with all of thems it is impressively efficient.


answered Dec 26 '19 at 22:01 by Super8 (40)

I've given two alternatives in a comment you made in another thread , i'll leave a synthesis, I should have answered here...

  • Arch Linux Professional Audio Wiki Article.
  • Musnix (wich means learning Nixos, a hard but extremely rewarding task).

answered Dec 26 '19 at 22:11 by Super8 (40)

Nowadays I am working on how to hack Instagram and you will visit soon this is very interesting


answered Dec 30 '19 at 06:50 by eddie007 (0)

Thanks for the post and nice to see this here. Picsart is one of the most feature-rich photo editing application for Android. how you can install and download picsart for pc full version is given here.


answered Mar 18 at 08:26 by stevride (7)

Thanks for the post and nice to see this here. Losing your extra body weight is now easy with the latest weight loss supplement named Leptitox. Read our in a detailed Leptitox Reviews to use it. leptin function


answered Mar 28 at 12:12 by miltonwill (7)

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or __italic__
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text]( "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported



Asked: Jul 05 '19 at 21:12

Seen: 1,215 times

Last updated: Apr 30 at 12:51